4 ms·
This article starts with a cliffhanger. The guy is in his sub at the bottom of the ocean and an electrical failure happens. Then it goes into his history and b
by damontal 6y ago
This article starts with a cliffhanger. The guy is in his sub at the bottom of the ocean and an electrical failure happens.
Then it goes into his history and builds the story from there... but it never revisits the moment of the beginning cliffhanger. How did he get back up? What was the result of the failure? At what point in the overall story did the failure occur?
- rwmj 6y agoAccording to Wikipedia he's still alive, so I guess it wasn't so serious that it stopped him resurfacing. But yes it would have been nice if the article had clarified what happened. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Vescovo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Vescovo
- akeck 6y agoHmmm... That seems like a possible editorial oversight. I've been fascinated with this article structure for awhile. In almost all the examples I've collected, the conclusion loops back to the original opener to provide inclusio after covering the background, etc. in the middle.
- jve 6y agoThis was the reason I did read that whole article. To find that info somwhere.
- ncmncm 6y agoIt said there were spares for all systems. So, evidently the spare didn't fail.