5 ms·
But what is "lost"? All the user gets is a warning that this site is not secure. Which is true. As long as browsers don't block these sites, or even until there
by poisonborz 6y ago
But what is "lost"? All the user gets is a warning that this site is not secure. Which is true. As long as browsers don't block these sites, or even until there is a maintained browser that can, this is just a necessary security feature.
- FerretFred 6y ago> As long as browsers don't block these sites This is the trend though, and ultimately I get the impression that Google/Chrome will just say "no".
- princekolt 6y ago"until this long list of conditions don't change, even though the industry has repeatedly changed these very constraints several times" is not something I would classify as trivial
- pmlnr 6y agoSSLv3 is deprecated and modern clients don't allow to use it any more. Old HTTPS servers, that predates TLS are already inaccessible.
- Avamander 6y agoYour point being?
- ivanhoe 6y ago> As long as browsers don't block these sites Not an expert on SEO, but I remember Google saying back in 2015 that sites using https will be preferred in search results?
- cesarb 6y ago> As long as browsers don't block these sites These warnings are a preparation to permanently block pre-TLS1.2 HTTPS. For some time after that, you will still be able to set a hidden preference to unblock them, but sooner or later, the code implementing pre-TLS1.2 HTTPS connections will be removed.