2 ms·
> ..78% of the world’s food all flow through SAP? Having worked in food industry as IT about 20y ago, we used to have fragmented system portfolio, and were str
by HenryBemis 6y ago
> ..78% of the world’s food all flow through SAP?
Having worked in food industry as IT about 20y ago, we used to have fragmented system portfolio, and were struggling to pull data from one system to another. The around 2002 management decided to switch to SAP. I remember working on the storage/capacity/CPU aspect of it (and mid-migration I left the company and completely missed on the SAP train in my career). That food company was providing milk, yogurt, cheese, juice, ice-cream to about 25mil people (customer base). That's SAP for you right there. So that 78% doesn't surprise me at all. I believe the remaining 23% is too small to invest that amount of $$$ nad just hasn't done it yet.
When you get the ability to "track every cucumber" from pick to sell, cut down on fraud, errors, be able to calculate every bit of profit, loss, why would you go anywhere else? I understand the initial cost may be hefty, but once you set it up (good and well), you can stop focusing on that, and see how to grow the business parts of your business, and not the admin.
- ntsplnkv2 6y agoSee this sounds good, and is why many execs are sold on it. But because it is so massive, it's impossible to find talent that can actually implement it properly. That's IF your company doesn't require a ridiculous amount of customization. Projects always run over-budget and over-time. Vendor lock-in becomes a huge problem. These companies solely exist to keep customers using their software and paying their service fees. They then provide just enough marketing buzzwords to justify it to execs who justify it to other execs. If SAP is done right, it is very powerful, but it is seldom done right.