4 ms·
I think that not telling students about different versions of tests is better for deterrence. Of course, not if applied once, but each test they will think twic
by stared 6y ago
I think that not telling students about different versions of tests is better for deterrence. Of course, not if applied once, but each test they will think twice before copy&paste of an answer.
...
Cheating is a form of deception. The person in the story wanted to cheat an exam, and then later - manipulate OP that they are the victim. One shouldn't fall for that.
- wodenokoto 6y ago> I think that not telling students about different versions of tests is better for deterrence. No. Deterrence is not putting up a hidden camera. Deterrence is when you tell people the area is monitored by cameras. People will slow down their car when they know the police is around, not when they don't know. If you want to catch cheaters, you set up anti cheating. If you want deter cheaters, you warn them about anti cheating measures.
- stared 6y agoWell, if you monitor a street, people slow down in this particular area and go back to their speeding once they leave the designed area. If students know which exams have extra measures, they won't cheat on them, and will get a free pass everywhere else. If you don't, sure - at first there is no deterrence, but later (after a few students get failed and exposed for cheating), it will deter others from trying.