5 ms·
> I think the fact that out of stock items aren't shown isn't a UX improvement. I see your point but I'd say it can be for certain items. A stupid example: if
by eitland 6y ago
> I think the fact that out of stock items aren't shown isn't a UX improvement.
I see your point but I'd say it can be for certain items. A stupid example: if I was shopping for air fresheners (I'm not;-) I'd rather not see my search results in the webshop polluted by every discontinued version of Wunderbaum they ever had in stock.
- barbegal 6y agoYes it is still advantageous to demote out of stock items in the search results. But if the store knows a certain Wunderbaum flavor is really popular but not in stock right now it should probably show up fairly highly in the search results. And there is a difference between being temporarily out of stock and discontinued.
- eps 6y agoJust order them by availability. In stock first, out of stock second.
- Semaphor 6y agoand if you don't make that clear, I scroll through a bunch of useless results. I can't remember a single time when I wanted out of stock items shown by default.
- pure-awesome 6y agoIn addition to this, mark them clearly as out-of-stock - fade out the preview image and prepend [out of stock] to the item description.
- OJFord 6y agoIdeally make it a choice - I don't like it when I order by price and it's overriden to (availability, price) - maybe it's out of stock because the price is that good, and I'm willing to wait.
- polytely 6y agoSome shops also have an expected delivery delay indicator in addition of their out-of-stock indicator, so if I want to buy a Moog Subharmonicon it will say _out of stock: order now and receive it in about 5 weeks._ Which is a really nice piece of UX in my opinion. [0]: https://www.bax-shop.nl/synthesizer?o=product_cdate https://www.bax-shop.nl/synthesizer?o=product_cdate
- lucideer 6y ago> I see your point but [...] I'd rather not see my search results in the webshop polluted There's three issues with this: 1. In UX, hiding things is a lazy solution to not being able to effectively differentiate items by relevance. There isn't an easy one-size-fits-all answer to doing the latter, which is why you need good, experienced UX people. Hiding things is what the inexperienced/lazy/bad ones do instead. 2. "Polluted" is also a codeword for "not of the clean, white, zero-inbox aesthetic I desire", and in certain situations this excuse is overused to enormously degrade UX in favour of a contrived sense of visual "cleanliness". A functional UI shouldn't be "clean", it should contain all the information you need to see (in a clear, differentiable, non-confusing way). 3. This is a stretch, but I think ideal system would differentiate between "currently out of stock" and "discontinued", and filtering out the latter is slightly less of a glaring issue.
- zaarn 6y agoThere is still a difference between "out of stock" and "discontinued", one is a superset of the other and one implies it will never go out of the state "out of stock" again.
- AdrianB1 6y agoDiscontinued products should be delisted.
- Wowfunhappy 6y agoIf the shop in the original story only hid "discontinued" parts, the author could have still run into this problem if the correct parts were no longer made.
- AdrianB1 6y agoI would use the checkbox on the left side (that many stores have) for in stock products.