I doubt that 'will', as it is commonly conceived, has any meaning, or at least a very different one, for a non-conscious agent. It's similar to the way i think

I doubt that 'will', as it is commonly conceived, has any meaning, or at least a very different one, for a non-conscious agent. It's similar to the way i think IIS is clouding rather than clarifying the issue. For related reasons, I feel that compatibilist positions on the issue are largely avoiding it. As for subjectivity, I had more to say about it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23162714 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23162714 Regardless of whether I am right or wrong on this, I think my other points in this post (platonism, etc.) are independent of it.