> This is a weak rant I challenge you to do the following: - Define what your assessment of the article as a "weak rant" means in objective terms. - Pick a r

> This is a weak rant I challenge you to do the following: - Define what your assessment of the article as a "weak rant" means in objective terms. - Pick a random sample of op-eds from major news outlets and measure them using your chosen metric I claim no reasonable definition of weakness/rantiness will disqualify the OP while allowing more than 20% of opinion pieces. But maybe you can prove me wrong.