I don't really understand the definition argument, I cannot imagine a definition of consciousness that feels like it's in good faith and sufficiently difficult

I don't really understand the definition argument, I cannot imagine a definition of consciousness that feels like it's in good faith and sufficiently difficult to capture intelligence and consciousness. Either you make a definition that seems we can clearly make that system eventually, or the definition is something that most would call unfair and narrow. Can you think of a "fair" definition that seems like AI systems couldn't get there? If not, this is not a valid counter point, and more of a communication problem. Any definition about a subset of tasks or creativity clearly is possible by AI systems, given the progress we're already seeing.