possibly shouldn't have used the word 'counterpoint'. c19 has given people an experience of "almost everyone WFH and the company didn't end". "There's no reas

possibly shouldn't have used the word 'counterpoint'. c19 has given people an experience of "almost everyone WFH and the company didn't end". "There's no reason they go back to thinking F2F is better, unless it actually is". It IS better for some people individually - we see it here on HN in comments from people who prefer to be able to go to an office. There isn't a "one size fits all" approach. To the extent that we see more WFH across the board, I think it'll be driven far more by "get rid of the office expense" - hard $ savings - vs "everyone's more productive!". They'll be "productive enough", relative to the cost savings of less (or no) office space. Just my 2c, obviously.