9 ms·
Shouldn’t the system be set up to reward the good thing more than the bad thing when possible? If someone is in a position of power from doing bad things, how
by willis936 7y ago
Shouldn’t the system be set up to reward the good thing more than the bad thing when possible? If someone is in a position of power from doing bad things, how could you expect them to stop of their own volition?
- jakelaboss 7y agoA system that rewards the morally 'right' behavior seems ripe for abuse. Should we not set the expectation that one should be 'good' as the base of our society contract?
- JustFinishedBSG 7y ago> how could you expect them to stop of their own volition? The threat of punishment ...? Your system encourage doing bad things when you are in a position of doing good things. If I discover a cure for cancer might as well rob a bank and kill my noisy neighbor just before publishing because I'll be pardoned
- naringas 7y ago> The threat of punishment ...? if this is the only reason not to harm others, then you'll probably look for (and likely find) a way to harm others and avoid punishment.
- nmeofthestate 7y agoPunishment is pointless because anyone who would be deterred by punishment would also be able to avoid punishment. Right.
- Chris2048 7y agoOr make it part of a plea deal
- CalChris 7y agoIn a sense, it did. That was taken into consideration at his sentencing. From his Wiki [1]: Hutchins was sentenced to time served and one year of supervised release. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Hutchins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Hutchins
- marcinzm 7y agoOne problem with rewarding an action is that humans are very good at gaming rules. For example, let's say I get X for donating to charity. I can for example setup my own charity, donate to it, pay myself all its income as salary and then just collect lot's of X. The US tax system is a perfect example of this I'd say.
- koheripbal 7y agoTo be clear, that specific example doesn't work at all, because salaried income from a non-profit is still fully taxable.
- vmception 7y agoNot really any benefit from that But the charity you setup would shelter your assets better than any prenup or other asset planning (or lack thereof) when you divorce your spouse
- gvjddbnvdrbv 7y agoI am not a lawyer but I'm guessing a judge would look pretty badly on doing this too obviously.
- vmception 7y agoOne of the most useful monetary goals in life is being able to afford US federal appeal's court. It's the only part of the system where arbiters of the law actually begin to analyze the law. There is no dog and pony show for jurors there, no instructions that a prosecutor can tell the judges and sway them. So it wouldn't matter what a single judge thought in lower court, if you were compliant.
- yazan94 7y agoThat logic doesn't make sense. Everyone has the potential to do something bad. If you have a concealed carry firearm with you, should you get rewarded for not shooting someone on a particular day?
- bryanrasmussen 7y agothe analogy is more like you had a concealed firearm with you and you shot a terrorist. although personally I think time served and probation seems about right.
- iso1631 7y agoIn the UK we stop terrorists with Narwhal tusks https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/30/narwhal-tusk-and-fire-extinguisher-used-to-tackle-london-bridge-attacker https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/30/narwhal-tusk... What's more interesting on the "good deed - bad deed" ometer is > Among those who pinned down the attacker was James Ford, 42, who is also thought to have tried to save the life of a woman who had been stabbed. Ford was jailed for life in 2004 for the murder of 21-year-old Amanda Champion.
- Ntrails 7y agoOne good deed is not enough to absolve, but one bad deed is enough to condemn.
- chapium 7y agoCan I steal a purse if I read to children at the library?