3 ms·
Read "fooled by randomness" if you haven't already. I much preferred it to his later work, and it introduced me to Popper (who was someone that 3 years of phil
by sixhobbits 6y ago
Read "fooled by randomness" if you haven't already. I much preferred it to his later work, and it introduced me to Popper (who was someone that 3 years of philosophy at university somehow managed to skip) who you might also enjoy.
- Pandabob 6y agoYup. While I appreciated the points he made in "Antifragile", the writing itself wasn't as enjoyable as it was in "Fooled by Randomness" or "The Black Swan". I haven't read "Skin in the Game" yet tho.
- sixhobbits 6y agoI managed to get through skin in the game, but I didn't enjoy the writing style at all. It's much more abrasive/emotional, similar to his tweets.
- thatswrong0 6y agoI tried to read this but just could not get over his writing style. It just felt so self-indulgent and took forever to get to the point. I have no idea why it's recommended so highly.
- alexilliamson 6y agoI don't know why it is, but I suspect it's the same reason people listen to Nate Silver