>So if ".org" is supposed to be for non-profits (and not-for-profits?) Where I live what English generally name a "non-profit" have a single important juridica

>So if ".org" is supposed to be for non-profits (and not-for-profits?) Where I live what English generally name a "non-profit" have a single important juridical difference: the assets of the organization belongs to the organization, and can not be transferred directly to founders or whoever has control of its board. Also a non-profit can benefit from some advantages on fiscal side that a for-profit can not, but the latter will far more likely "optimize" their contribution to public services.