4 ms·
This is a good article, if for nothing else besides that button gem which I somehow haven't heard of before. The downside is, there will be a bunch of sites th
by tomkarlo 16y ago
This is a good article, if for nothing else besides that button gem which I somehow haven't heard of before.
The downside is, there will be a bunch of sites that look the same, so folks will want to do some real work and find their own components.
- _Lemon_ 16y agoI'd contest that it would only matter if you're the same as everyone else if it's contrary to your goal(s). What is your goal? For most it would be to get users to purchase something (aka, make money). There's the other upside that if your website isn't radically different from others, a lot of your users will already know how to use it. There could be a lot to gain with a lot of your visitors knowing how to extract information from it. I guess the only real way to know is by testing!
- tomkarlo 16y agoYeah, I'd agree. I've seen far more UI design crime done in the name of "doing it a new way for the sake of it" than is caused by being similar to other implementations.
- proexploit 16y agoThe article is very specifically geared towards producing a prototype quickly, not producing a great design. Therefore, similar looking sites don't really factor into the issue being addressed. You might also enjoy: https://github.com/mbriggs/zurb-awesome-buttons https://github.com/mbriggs/zurb-awesome-buttons [demo: http://www.zurb.com/blog_uploads/0000/0617/buttons-03.html http://www.zurb.com/blog_uploads/0000/0617/buttons-03.html] - can be installed using bundler and is cleaner than the button gem.
- squarepeg 16y agothere's also my buttons mixin based on css3-buttons: https://gist.github.com/856243 https://gist.github.com/856243