3 ms·
That doesn't disprove bavell's point. Grocery stores are orders of magniutde less safe and orders of magnitude more frequented than Tesla factories. Let's be V
by sjwright 6y ago
That doesn't disprove bavell's point.
Grocery stores are orders of magniutde less safe and orders of magnitude more frequented than Tesla factories. Let's be VERY conservative and propose that the factory is a mere 10× less risk than a supermarket. Let's assume that grocery stores are used by 100× more people than Tesla factory employees. That means grocery stores represent a 1,000× higher risk than Tesla's factory. And that's conservative.
But it's actually worse than that. If working at the Telsa factory reduces the frequency in which these employees must visit a supermarket (reduced use of store-bought toilet paper, reduced consumption of store-bought food) then its opening could arguably lower the overall risk profile.
- mehrdadn 6y agoI really don't think the situation is simple enough that you can rationalize a decision to it in 15 seconds.
- sjwright 6y agoMoot—I'm not the one making the decision. I was just responding to arguments with other arguments. That's how an internet discussion works. If you say I was "rationalising" Tesla's decision to open the factory, you were equally "rationalising" the County's decision to keep it closed.