Sure, but he participated in a drive by shooting. I'm on board with giving people a chance to learn etc, but I don't see why giving someone a second chance invo

Sure, but he participated in a drive by shooting. I'm on board with giving people a chance to learn etc, but I don't see why giving someone a second chance involves contracting with them to purchase surveillance services, and give them access to security camera footage, 911 calls, etc. Especially with already existing concerns about bias and privacy rights with these platforms. I don't think that a good second chance for someone that participated in a racially motivated drive by shooting is putting them in charge of a very sensitive part of the criminal justice system...