4 ms·
These are substantially more powerful than both of those families.
by btashton 6y ago
These are substantially more powerful than both of those families.
- ATsch 6y agoAlso substantially more expensive, especially compared to the likes of the banana pi zero, which gets you four cores at 1.2Ghz, 512MB RAM, Linux and a GPU for 35% cheaper. Pair that with a Blue Pill STM32 for $3 if you need realtime and you still have money left over.
- subhobroto 6y agoThat looks like a great stack! In the "Pi" family, for a Linux SBC, which pi/clone gives a good bang for the buck? banana pi zero has shown up multiple times but since you are in the know, I wanted to ask what's a good SBC to run OpenWRT on, for example
- subhobroto 6y ago> Blue Pill STM32 for $3 The Black Pill STM32 for $4 are an ever better value!
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- clarry 6y agohttps://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32-32-bit-arm-cortex-mcus/stm32-high-performance-mcus.html https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/microcontrolle...
- btashton 6y agoWhat is your point? This is more powerful than all of the ones on your linked page.
- clarry 6y agoThe posted coremark scores do not support your claim that NXP iMXRT1062 is substantially more powerful. If I take these numbers at face value, then STM32 promises up to 45% more perf.
- duskwuff 6y agoMarginally. The STM32H7 series offers Cortex-M7 cores at up to 480 MHz, with a Cortex-M4 coprocessor on some parts at 240 MHz. It's not quite as fast as the i.MXRT1052, but it's damn close.