3 ms·
No, the other guy is right. Technically the definition of real-time can have a lot of leeway. Here's the paper linked in the article. Note how the authors never
by swebs 6y ago
No, the other guy is right. Technically the definition of real-time can have a lot of leeway. Here's the paper linked in the article. Note how the authors never define what they really mean by real-time. They even make statements like "runs 1.9 times faster than real-time". They certainly imply your definition, but there's plenty of wiggle room to say "Well technically, I wasn't lying"
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/3/766/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/3/766/pdf
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- zodiac 6y agoIn the context of e.g. offline video encoders "1.9x realtime" is a statement about throughput, not latency