4 ms·
Or it can be seen as "we need some standard, so we'll use NIST". Then the data is at least normalized with respect to NIST.
by crankylinuxuser 6y ago
Or it can be seen as "we need some standard, so we'll use NIST".
Then the data is at least normalized with respect to NIST.
- SiempreViernes 6y agoYou'll have to explain why using a single database, when there are several available that focus on being extra reliable on different elements, is a defensible choice. I fully understand "let's just use NIST because that's easiest", but that's not a serious attitude if you want to claim something about reality rather than the NIST database itself.
- crankylinuxuser 6y agoI see that you only attacked the data source, NIST. You didn't attack/discuss normalization of said data, which was 1/2 of what I said.
- SiempreViernes 6y agoWhat normalisation? There's certainly no clear talk of normalisation in the paper.