2 ms·
I build LLVM+Clang regularly and it definitely does not take 70GB.
by jcelerier 7y ago
I build LLVM+Clang regularly and it definitely does not take 70GB.
- tempay 7y agoThey're probably building doing a debug build which is incredibly disk intensive in my experience.
- schlupa 7y agollvm+clang v10 on Linux builds 8 GB in bin, 13GB in lib and >5 GB in tools + things here an there. That's ~30 GB. Then you need that much for the install. So hard requirement 2 x 30 GB + some slack. Last time I built it was around version 4 and it did not need that much disk space.
- jcelerier 7y ago> llvm+clang v10 on Linux builds 8 GB in bin, 13GB in lib and >5 GB in tools + things here an there. just checked and my build folder with llvm & clang is 3GB. That's a release build (pass -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release !!) - you don't need a debug build unless you're hacking on llvm itself > Then you need that much for the install you want make install/strip, not make install (but why do you need to install ? you can run clang from the build dir just fine)
- schlupa 7y agoThank you for your tips. It's a pity that this information is not very visible on the quick start page.