> I could have set up a static site generator Instead of generating HTML from markdown & sticking it in a template, your posts are HTML and you stick them in a

> I could have set up a static site generator Instead of generating HTML from markdown & sticking it in a template, your posts are HTML and you stick them in a template. Instead of hand-writing the HTML, you're using an HTML WYSIWYG editor (google docs). Unless I'm missing something this is a static site generator. And if it suits your needs that's fantastic, sometimes I feel like markdown & git tracking is overkill as well (what I do). The primary thing holding me back from this is lack of code snippets. Incidentally how does it handle images? My take: https://sequoia.makes.software/lets-code-it-static-site-generator/ https://sequoia.makes.software/lets-code-it-static-site-gene...