5 ms·
I guess it's "extremely reasonable" as long as you're extremely comfortable living in a box, only accepting viewpoints that align with your own, and to hell wit
by burgerzzz 6y ago
I guess it's "extremely reasonable" as long as you're extremely comfortable living in a box, only accepting viewpoints that align with your own, and to hell with everyone, including your family who don't agree with YOU. Because when it comes down to it, it's not about them, it's about you.
- albedoa 6y agoWe are talking about "radical views" here, not simply "viewpoints that don't align with our own". It's bizarre that you think those are the same.
- burgerzzz 6y agoIf you use the most reductive reasoning possible, then sure, I guess it's bizarre.
- albedoa 6y agoNobody is reducing your comments. That is what you wrote.
- kerkeslager 6y agoWhat's the difference?
- albedoa 6y agoI'm happy to continue the conversation, but we shouldn't entertain the rantings of the guy who claims to believe that repeating the basis of his argument back to him is reductive. My Keybase is in the bio, either twitter or [my domain]@gmail.com
- kerkeslager 6y agoJust don't respond to him? You made your statement here, you can defend your statement here.
- albedoa 6y agoYou asked the question! If the reason you asked it is because you are genuinely interested in the answer, then you can reach out. No problem otherwise.
- kerkeslager 6y agoI asked a question about something you said in public, and it's a bit odd that you refuse to clarify in public.
- albedoa 6y agoYou transcend parody: http://wondermark.com/c/2014-09-19-1062sea.png http://wondermark.com/c/2014-09-19-1062sea.png I seriously doubt that you are unfamiliar with how people respond to sea lions, but you should get used to it. You are not entitled to my or anyone's response.