4 ms·
Most of these charts ignore non-wage income such as employer paid healthcare. https://medium.com/@russroberts/do-the-rich-capture-all-the-gains-from-economic-gr
by shuckles 6y ago
Most of these charts ignore non-wage income such as employer paid healthcare. https://medium.com/@russroberts/do-the-rich-capture-all-the-gains-from-economic-growth-c96d93101f9c https://medium.com/@russroberts/do-the-rich-capture-all-the-...
- Barrin92 6y agoIt seems like Russ is trying to make a fundamentally different point in that piece than people generally try to make. His main point seems to be that, if you track people over the last 30 years, they have made economic progress individually. That to me seems extremely obvious though. Someone who is 50 or 60 is almost certainly going to be in a better financial position than the same person at 30, as many people tend to develop more skills or advance their career, it would be straight-up crazy if that wasn't the case. However, it does not address the actual issue of the poorest as a demographic. What people are saying that if the nation as a whole gets richer, you would expect that 40 years later the floor has risen as well, not that the poor are simply different people.
- shuckles 6y agoNo it also looks at income across generations within quartiles, e.g. "But [incomes of] 93% of the children in the poorest households — those in the bottom 20% — surpassed their parents...Julia Isaacs’s study for the Pew Charitable Trusts looking at the late 1960’s up to 2002 finds that children raised in the poorest families made the largest gains as adults relative to children born into richer families."