26 ms·
So would you be arguing that we cannot determine whether or not the Holocaust actually occurred, otherwise we would be creating a tyrant? Because that's what t
by fzeroracer 7y ago
So would you be arguing that we cannot determine whether or not the Holocaust actually occurred, otherwise we would be creating a tyrant?
Because that's what the author was arguing about.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 7y agoStop. Why people are so afraid of debating this? The position is past the retarded point, but actively censoring it only gives it more credence. Would it not be better to have retarded positions challenged openly?
- fzeroracer 7y agoAfraid of debating what? I am debating it. His argument was that you cannot have an arbiter of truth determine the truthiness of certain things. I brought up an example which was used in the article itself which is that the platform houses people who deny the holocaust happens. Do you agree that we cannot determine that the holocaust happened then? That it is impossible to determine that it actually occurred?
- A4ET8a8uTh0 7y agoI believe that arbiter of truth, including and not limited to Holocaust, should not exist. I think that even thinking of considering suggesting one and only true way is dangerous. Would you feel so strongly about moon if I told you it was made out of cheese?
- sabarn01 7y agoIt occurred there is ample evidence it occurred. The fear I have is that once a government has a power it never goes away. No matter how well meaning the original intent is people you disagree with will eventually come to power and use that power against you.