3 ms·
Very true. I'm in a different part of the country (I'm in Boston, they're in Philadelphia) and tried running the benchmarks myself about a week ago. Unfortunate
by cosmojg 6y ago
Very true. I'm in a different part of the country (I'm in Boston, they're in Philadelphia) and tried running the benchmarks myself about a week ago. Unfortunately, I didn't save the results, but if you take my word for it, I remember getting similar results with only slightly different numbers. Your best bet, of course, is to run the benchmarks yourself: https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/forgeperf https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/forgeperf
Some other people ran the benchmarks from different places in Europe and got similar results with "nothing significantly different" from those published: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22900649 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22900649
- odensc 6y agoI'll try it out later today. Would be interesting to see actually because, completely anecdotally, GitLab seems faster than sr.ht in my daily usage.
- cosmojg 6y agoDon't make the same mistake that I did! Save your results and share them with the class. :)
- odensc 6y agoHere: https://report-delta.now.sh https://report-delta.now.sh SourceHut is still the winner of most, but GitHub is a lot faster than in the report on forgeperf.org. I think the perceived speediness of GitHub for me can be mostly attributed to the fact they don't trigger a full page reload for every navigation. Whereas SourceHut is rendered completely server-side AFAIK. (I meant GitHub in my previous comment, fyi.)