Above he mentions that “if it were there from the start it would obey the same rules”... so I guess he does... though where evidence for this comes from isn’t c

Above he mentions that “if it were there from the start it would obey the same rules”... so I guess he does... though where evidence for this comes from isn’t clear from me (unless it’s some kind of circular logic along the lines of “if it is in the same plane then it must have been there from the start, and if the perturbations in the Oort Cloud objects is consistent with an object in the ecliptic plane, then it must be that if t’s a black hole it was captured early on”, or something like that. I dunno, to be honest. I don’t want to appear like I’m a polemicist with an axe to grind and sour grapes, but as I said in my original post... there’s something about this whole thing that just confuses me a bit.