4 ms·
> SQS is obviously what you want if you're interested in guarantees that each message is handled once and only once. You mean SQS FIFO? SQS classic cannot guar
by ignoramous 7y ago
> SQS is obviously what you want if you're interested in guarantees that each message is handled once and only once.
You mean SQS FIFO? SQS classic cannot guarantee exactly-once delivery or ingestion, either due to failure at the client or server. SQS FIFO, however; can but requires both the client and the server to work in-tandem to ensure exactly-once processing.
- awinder 7y agoAnd your queue throughput also gets destroyed by flipping that FIFO option, it’s a mess. How’s amazon’a kafka offering going?
- isugimpy 7y agoI'm not a fan of it, personally. The interface is lacking, configurability after launch is minimal at best, and the observability is EXTREMELY poor because you can't get per-topic metrics without paying extra.