5 ms·
That makes sense. Following that logic, the version that will be "free" will require Lion.
by alexk7 16y ago
That makes sense. Following that logic, the version that will be "free" will require Lion.
- masklinn 16y agoIndeed, that is what I meant, but I may have lost myself in my word-soup. (note: "free" for everybody, Xcode 4 is already "free" if you're part of Apple's subscriber developer programs at $99/year). On the other hand, it's annoying that Apple leaves everybody in the dark: if Lion is released in, say, 6 months. And if Xcode 4 is "free" on Lion. Does that mean non-subscribers bought 6 months of Xcode for $5? Isn't that a bit sucky?
- spicyj 16y agoThat's less than 3 cents per day; not a huge cost, especially if you're using it for work. How many other things can you rent for less than $1/month?
- masklinn 16y ago> That's less than 3 cents per day; not a huge cost, especially if you're using it for work. If you use it for work, I'd expect you have a (paid) developer account, therefore you got it for free. Professionals using Xcode for work are by far the least likely to need to pay for Xcode 4. Hobbyists or free-software developers, on the other hand...
- chc 16y agoNo hobbyist needs to pay for Xcode 4. You can use Xcode 3 for free, or you can pay $5 and use Xcode 4 without having to wait for and buy Lion, or you can just wait and get it free with Lion.
- chc 16y agoNot really. If you value Xcode 4 so little that $5 to get it six months early (before spending $150 to get it with Lion) is "sucky" for you, it doesn't sound like you wanted it in the first place.