> No they are haters because they are spreading FUD about Ext.js with no true or substantial points to support their claims. Does you claiming the opposite mak

> No they are haters because they are spreading FUD about Ext.js with no true or substantial points to support their claims. Does you claiming the opposite make your comment valuable? > This is laughable. Microsoft and Google use jQuery for web pages. Not applications. Looks at Gmail and find jQuery there ??? Sorry, I can't take nobody seriously who uses meaningless buzzwords in this context. Your comment is laughable. > If they want to waste their time and be overtaken by the competition who are making better use of resources they are entitled to make that poor judgement. Again: poor assumption. > It takes less resources to extend Ext.js that is does to replicate it. What if the functionality inside Ext.js is not what you need? You can extend a hammer to make a tank, it's just not practical. > Spreading FUD about a framework that is completely false is trollish behavior. I did not do that. Your 1 day old account and your tone suggest otherwise.