> The primary problem with electronic voting is no possible enforcement of no coercive force rule, not tallying security. How is this not "blessed by maths" as

> The primary problem with electronic voting is no possible enforcement of no coercive force rule, not tallying security. How is this not "blessed by maths" as not in the previous problem? Someone somewhere has to bless something, be it a valid vote or a valid digital signature. If there is a "Pope" for one, there should be a "Pope" for the other. Medical, government, religious ... someone somewhere must have a magic "I Bless This" magic wand and all henceforth below shall must be valid. Why is the branch of "digital signature" considered "good" in this respect but "voting" not? "Medical" not"? I viciously hate to say the term, yet ... this seems so "tri-cameral" ... and in terms of schizophrenia of illogic.