> The money is to be made telling stories about it vs doing it. Which is why I think the article is complete fiction. It's funny, but it also just reads like b

> The money is to be made telling stories about it vs doing it. Which is why I think the article is complete fiction. It's funny, but it also just reads like bad fiction to me. The dialogue doesn't seem natural, and the writing doesn't sound so much like someone describing something they actually experienced as it does like someone mimicking a storytelling style they've seen elsewhere. Add on top of it that almost every aspect of it seems ripped directly from the first half of "21" (the Kevin Spacey movie about the MIT crew) and it just comes across as an amateurish attempt to borrow someone else's story. The fact that these techniques she claims they used just don't work anymore seals it for me.