> There seems to be a lot of evidence pointing to this, and while its still an emerging area I'm confused as to how you are stating that this system and these d

> There seems to be a lot of evidence pointing to this, and while its still an emerging area I'm confused as to how you are stating that this system and these drugs that interact with it, which has a lot of evidence that it is part of the disease pathophysiology, are weak on evidence? Because there is evidence to the contrary, which I posted. Some even from a few months ago. My goal is to bring balance to the discussion. Too often we see only the headlines that something might cause ${DREADED_DISEASE}, but ignore studies saying the opposite. It's a play on fear. > What is your background and the experience you have to be able to state what you just said? This is needlessly confrontational. My background: PhD in chemistry. While relatively unrelated, I do know how to read and find follow-up research. My interest also stems from taking a PPI, and hearing only the one side from concerned family members.