6 ms·
Close proximity to a large volume of people with $100k salaries and who strongly signal that they value reducing their carbon footprint was not factored in when
by seangrogg 6y ago
Close proximity to a large volume of people with $100k salaries and who strongly signal that they value reducing their carbon footprint was not factored in when he first started selling premium electric vehicles nearby? That's an interesting hypothesis.
- chrischen 6y agoThere’s no reason to have a factory there. It’s not as if Apple manufacturers iPhone in California, or anywhere near it.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- acid__ 6y agoHm, I can’t claim to be an expert, but my first thought is that the logistics of transporting thousands of iPhones is very, very different from transporting thousands of cars.
- nazka 6y agoIt is. You can build parts of a car anywhere in the world. But because the cost of shipment will be so high you have to build the car in the same part of your continent if not the same country or state.
- jackvalentine 6y agoThere was no significant shipping/logistics advantage to manufacturing cars in Australia. After 30 years of increasing imports when government subsidies ended so did local manufacturing. Most cars sold in the country are now built in Thailand, South Africa, Japan, Europe and increasingly the USA - without any kind of huge price jump over locally produced vehicles.
- ehnto 6y agoLikewise no expert, but at the price point cars sell at, I doubt the cost of shipping vehicles was a primary concern. Consider that Australian vehicles are made everywhere except Australia, even commodity cars, and Australia is notoriously expensive to ship to. We even had factories here, but they were too expensive to run. It's cheaper to ship them from overseas.
- refurb 6y agoDo people buying the cars really care where it was made? I'm sure Tesla would have sold just as many if they were made in say, North Carolina.