3 ms·
> Calling it an outrage "mob" is dishonest > Again, it's especially telling that you and the people who defend attribute zero fault to the person who actually
by ravenstine 7y ago
> Calling it an outrage "mob" is dishonest
> Again, it's especially telling that you and the people who defend attribute zero fault to the person who actually wrote the memo.
I've been honest and I replied in good faith, and yet you just sidestep and lump me in with some made up group of people whom you say attribute "zero fault" to Damore. You didn't listen to me at all. You didn't even ask me what faults I would attribute to Damore after I denied your perception of what I'm thinking. Why should anyone have a conversation with you?
- wpietri 7y agoIf you're replying in good faith, you should either defend your "outrage mob" accusation or apologize for it.
- ravenstine 7y agoSo they can just dismiss things I say and pretend they can read my mind, but I am supposed to either defend or apologize for it because someone says so? EDIT: I mistakenly thought your comment was from the person I was having the conversation with.
- wpietri 7y agoThanks for the correction. That's an easy mistake to make here! I've done it myself.