3 ms·

I have been talking about vote-by-mail only, and I made that clear in a previous reply to you, so arguing for any vote by mail, as though I oppose it, comes acr

by daenz 6y ago

I have been talking about vote-by-mail only, and I made that clear in a previous reply to you, so arguing for any vote by mail, as though I oppose it, comes across as a strawman. >So if you'd like to convince the general public, the thing to do is to allow both approaches and let people pick. That's exactly what the majority of states do, but CA is forcing vote-by-mail only. Also, I was courteous enough to post my sources when talking about public opinion, I would appreciate the same courtesy.

wpietri 6y ago
The bit of data I didn't cite comes from the 2018 Pew report. You have also worked yourself into a tizzy over nothing. CA is not forcing vote-by-mail only. Newsom's order is only about requiring everybody to receive a ballot. Rules for in-person voting will be determined county by county, and those rules are still being developed. If you aren't opposed to vote by mail, you did a poor job of making that clear. This chunk of the discussion started out with "Voter fraud ahoy!" You jumped in to fret about "undetectable cheating". If you don't think that vote by mail is any less secure, I have no idea what your goal is, and rereading your posts doesn't help.