> This amounts to saying "we don't yet have a good theory of quantum gravity" Er, yep. Thanks for taking the time to do roundabout arguments that lead to this

> This amounts to saying "we don't yet have a good theory of quantum gravity" Er, yep. Thanks for taking the time to do roundabout arguments that lead to this very simple thing that we're not even disagreeing about. Sorry for not just stating this in a better way outright. > string theory is the only candidate I'm aware of that is a QFT of any sort. Loop Quantum Gravity is built from a QFT called "Group Field Theory" too, that's why they still have their renormalization problem. I suppose you could argue that it's "not comprehensive" enough, or that it's not a serious contender. > Newton's laws and Maxwell's Equations are incompatible approximations. ...and they are therefore both failed paradigms, but we're not going to agree about that opinion. All I can add is to say that we're never going to find a fifth Maxwell equation that works with the other four and explains more things within that framework. That's all I mean by "failed" and it's probably a controversial perspective.