> So you're saying that animal feed isn't vegetation? Are you serious? Of course they are vegetation, but hardy vegetation like wheat can grow in a lot of plac

> So you're saying that animal feed isn't vegetation? Are you serious? Of course they are vegetation, but hardy vegetation like wheat can grow in a lot of places efficiently with harsh weather. But avocados can't. https://homeguides.sfgate.com/climate-avocado-tree-need-grow-55865.html https://homeguides.sfgate.com/climate-avocado-tree-need-grow... Avocados require stable dry heat and relatively little wind. Good luck trying to find that in the midwest where most of the animal feed are grown. > rather than just unfounded assertions? That different vegetation grows in different environments isn't an unfounded assertion. It's an obvious fact of nature. Only a vegan wouldn't know that. But lets be honest, no amount of facts or data is going to change the mind of a vegan cultist. You just want data/facts just so you can figure out how to lie better or ignore the facts/data next time. Right? Oh yeah, almonds and many other vegan foods are absolutely horrible for the environment. https://www.motherjones.com/food/2014/07/your-almond-habit-sucking-califoirnia-dry/ https://www.motherjones.com/food/2014/07/your-almond-habit-s... I bet you virtue signal about the environment, climate change, etc all the time. The environmental damage and climate change are a result of globalism. Guess which diet is dependent entirely on globalism? That's right the vegan diet. A carnivore and omnivore diet can be sourced locally. A vegan diet cannot be sourced locally. A vegan in alaska or puerto rico or anywhere on earth cannot survive on locally sourced vegan diet. They need to steal vegetation from all over the world to barely survive. Yay for the cult of veganism!