3 ms·
Until the danger is reduced (via therapeutics or societal adaptations), your unqualified and unquantified "many" would ideally have to wait until they become a
by jddj 6y ago
Until the danger is reduced (via therapeutics or societal adaptations), your unqualified and unquantified "many" would ideally have to wait until they become a qualified and quantified majority.
That's how living in a modern society rather than a vacuum is supposed to play out, anyway.
In reality, the economic concerns (note: this is different from "I'd rather die than live in isolation [for a few months]!") will probably win out soon enough.
- heavenlyblue 6y agoThe quantified majority is already voting for it in the UK: nobody really cares about it that much and are going out in the parks. There’s quite a few occurrences of politicians going to their second home/visiting extended family and I cannot believe other people don’t do that. So in reality people are not doing what you think they are doing, and that’s even worse. On top of this all I don’t remember people actually voting on this matter. This all had been forced on us by the governments. Nevertheless, I am very much pro-isolation. But I don’t really care about it - my life hasn’t had any drastic changes and I can still do most of the things I was doing from home. Most of the people can’t afford that.