4 ms·

https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20consumption&indicator=Total%20final%20consumption%20(TFC)%20by%20source https://www.iea.org

https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20consumption&indicator=Total%20final%20consumption%20(TFC)%20by%20source https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/?country=WORLD&fuel=... With regards to Thorium and Fusion. Again i don't think anyone here really appreciates how hard a problem energy storage is. Fuel Cells that can actually be used like oil or gas or coal is sci-fi and the some still to be seen magic grid won't change that. A good tell is that I have gotten 20 downvotes from this discussion but not a single piece of evidence that what I am saying is wrong. Not a single technology or system in use at scale. Only wishful thinking.

epistasis 6y ago
You have been very wrong, and refused to acknowledge the rebuttals to your false points. For example, you point to IEA'a current solar usage stats, so you are presumably using them for your far more controversial statement "not expected to grow substantially," which is a somewhat comical thing to say. The people who have been making that prediction of "not expected to grow substantially" have been ludicrously wrong, for a looooong time. This is from way back in 2017, and the IEA has not improved their projections since then: https://steinbuch.wordpress.com/2017/06/12/photovoltaic-growth-reality-versus-projections-of-the-international-energy-agency/ https://steinbuch.wordpress.com/2017/06/12/photovoltaic-grow... The IEA stats are probably correct for current usage. It's a lot harder to put your thumb on the scale when it comes to grid measurements. But when it comes to renewable tech, the IEA has been hilariously wrong because they are backward looking and refuse to acknowledge the reality of what's going on right now. Accusing others of "wishful thinking" when you can't back up your own claims, is not a very civil thing to do. To ignore the cited examples of where storage has worked is also not a very civil thing to do. To make such broad proclamations about the feasibility of a technology without even being aware of the current deployments is not a very wise position to take. Talking about shipping technologies low adoption rates as proof that they cannot grow is a logically incorrect statement. But to then propose technologies that are not shipping and are no where close to shipping (thorium, fusion), as more realistic, well, let's bring up again who is doing the wishful thinking and wearing rose colored glasses.
- ThomPete 6y ago
  You are the one claiming things about the future you can't prove, not me. I have pointed to a source you haven't pointed to anything. I will leave it to others to judge who have facts to back up their claims.
Tade0 6y ago
Your own source indicates that solar + wind have been growing at a rate of 10%+ for over a decade now. Not sure I understand what were you trying to say by this.
- ThomPete 6y ago
  Yes through countries forcing it and still not more than 1% of the global world energy consumption.

epistasis 6y ago

You have been very wrong, and refused to acknowledge the rebuttals to your false points. For example, you point to IEA'a current solar usage stats, so you are presumably using them for your far more controversial statement "not expected to grow substantially," which is a somewhat comical thing to say. The people who have been making that prediction of "not expected to grow substantially" have been ludicrously wrong, for a looooong time. This is from way back in 2017, and the IEA has not improved their projections since then: https://steinbuch.wordpress.com/2017/06/12/photovoltaic-growth-reality-versus-projections-of-the-international-energy-agency/ https://steinbuch.wordpress.com/2017/06/12/photovoltaic-grow... The IEA stats are probably correct for current usage. It's a lot harder to put your thumb on the scale when it comes to grid measurements. But when it comes to renewable tech, the IEA has been hilariously wrong because they are backward looking and refuse to acknowledge the reality of what's going on right now. Accusing others of "wishful thinking" when you can't back up your own claims, is not a very civil thing to do. To ignore the cited examples of where storage has worked is also not a very civil thing to do. To make such broad proclamations about the feasibility of a technology without even being aware of the current deployments is not a very wise position to take. Talking about shipping technologies low adoption rates as proof that they cannot grow is a logically incorrect statement. But to then propose technologies that are not shipping and are no where close to shipping (thorium, fusion), as more realistic, well, let's bring up again who is doing the wishful thinking and wearing rose colored glasses.

ThomPete 6y ago
You are the one claiming things about the future you can't prove, not me. I have pointed to a source you haven't pointed to anything. I will leave it to others to judge who have facts to back up their claims.

Tade0 6y ago

Your own source indicates that solar + wind have been growing at a rate of 10%+ for over a decade now. Not sure I understand what were you trying to say by this.

ThomPete 6y ago
Yes through countries forcing it and still not more than 1% of the global world energy consumption.