4 ms·

A particularly ridiculous version of this is "spreading" in debate, where you speak extremely fast so that your opponent has difficulty addressing all your poin

• wgerard 6y ago
  To be fair, I remember this being a problem even when I participated in middle school debate ~20 years ago. If you make a bunch of points that the other team doesn't refute directly, you get to nail them on it later. Short of you speaking so quickly that even the judge didn't understand you, it was heavily encouraged to speak extremely quickly even back then.
  • Ididntdothis 6y ago
    Stuff like this is why I don’t put any weight into whoever “wins” a debate. There is skill involved but in debating but it’s not about who had the facts on their side.
    • crankylinuxuser 6y ago
      But what about the points you didn't cover? They're correct, right? /s But yeah, I considered doing debate as I thought it was about logic and truthfulness. After watching a spectacle like this locally, I noped out of it.
    • renewiltord 6y ago
      It's just a game, right? Would be like concluding which country is more powerful, UK or Croatia, based off a football game.