3 ms·
> but that doesn't punch the emotional and neurochemical pathways the way politicians and news peddlers want Every discussion involving advertising or app mark
by _jal 7y ago
> but that doesn't punch the emotional and neurochemical pathways the way politicians and news peddlers want
Every discussion involving advertising or app marketing here inevitably attracts tons of comments adopting a let's-be-real-here, this-is-just-how-it-is tone about the realities of the industry. And yet these same people are also experts on the news industry and know the exact opposite is true there, that "de-politicized" or "balanced" news is somehow a thing that is not only possible but stupidly trivial to produce.
I mean, I get it, I utterly despise crabbed, shoddy, stupid journalism, too. But don't pretend there's some trivial fix. It is the way it is because of a combination of economic and ultimately social pressures. It is as much a symptom as a cause.
- clairity 7y agoi certainly didn't suggest the systemic fix was trivial, and that the equilibrium we've reached around news and advertising isn't cogent and compelling. but as individuals, we each have the capacity to center ourselves emotionally, clear our heads, and think critically about the coercive messages we're being fed. we have that power, and it is effective.