5 ms·
I was more reacting to the common argument that "$5 is not expensive". My apologies if that's not what they were addressing in this comment. That said, Xcode 3
by holman 16y ago
I was more reacting to the common argument that "$5 is not expensive". My apologies if that's not what they were addressing in this comment.
That said, Xcode 3 doesn't satisfy the requirement of being easy or quick to install for a casual user.
- dekz 16y agoWhat isn't easy about installing from the disc given when you bought the mac? Don't have a your mac discs anymore? Download it or borrow someone elses. If you don't want the extra crud of iOS firmwares, disable it. To be honest it's quite "easy" to install for any user. Quick on the other hand, how many 4.5gb installations are quick?
- matt2224 16y agoWhat's this rubbish about Xcode 3 being hard to install? It's on your OS X CD. From there on, it's just a one-click install process. Even if you downloaded it, the process is the same. If a developer can't be bothered to do that, then they probably dont give a damn in the first place. Casual users =/= developers
- bradleyland 16y agoWhat it comes down to is a question of principle. The argument that development tools should be free and readily available is a principle of software freedom. I don't want to paint this as black & white, because things rarely are, but on the continuum of free (as in freedom) vs non-free, you'd have to live in a cave on the moon to still cling to the idea that Apple is anywhere near the free side of the scale. You, as a developer, have to make a decision about how you will support your principles. Apple has certainly made theirs. They view their entire platform as theirs to do with as they wish. That is the anti-thesis of freedom. Do not expect this to change.