9 ms·

Twitch Is Developing Talk Shows and Dating Programs for Gamers

66 points by haneefmubarak 6y ago

mirimir 6y ago
Honest question: Is "gamer" a very useful category? I never enjoyed board games, and I grew up before electronic games existed, so I'm clearly not one. I have relatives who are, however. And they play games that are so different that it seems irrelevant to getting who they are. In other words, doesn't it matter more what sorts of games people like?
- Mindwipe 6y ago
  I expect "gamer" here is used as shorthand for "Twitch's existing audience."
- ausbah 6y ago
  as someone in this thread mentioned, being a "gamer" has a very strong group identity despite varying wildly across different genres and platforms however despite the label being so shallow that literally anyone who touches a game every now and then can adopt the label, there still exist gamer "subgroups" who hold vitriolic ideas on what a "real gamer" is. I believe this exclusionary version of the label normally takes the form of men ages 15-35 lashing out at any game that veers too far from what is "acceptable" on race, gender, sex, etc. deeming them to be the byproduct of "SJWs who want to ruin our games"
  - mirimir 6y ago
    That's what I was thinking, more or less. And I just found this survey: https://www.polygon.com/2017/1/20/14337282/games-for-women-and-girls https://www.polygon.com/2017/1/20/14337282/games-for-women-a... I'm guessing that "real gamers" play games that are most popular among male players. But maybe "gamer" is simply shorthand for "people who play games". Edit: So am I a "gamer", because I pose online as various fictional personas? Or because, in meatspace, I pose as an unremarkable person?
wyck 6y ago
Dating? So they learned nothing about the dismal effects of reality TV's on culture and content creators? Here's a better suggestion, fire the person who thought moving laterally into a garbage dump was a good idea.
- cat199 6y ago
  > So they learned nothing about the dismal effects of reality TV's on culture and content creators? no, in the hetero case at least, they probably learned alot from being able to monetize a ridiculous desparate-M:attractive-F ratio from things like tinder
- paulcole 6y ago
  I knew Chuck Woolery was responsible for society’s ills.
- istorical 6y ago
  At this point Twitch is starting to become part of Big Content, and Big Content doesn't care about what you think is good for society, Big Content cares about what gets clicks and views. Twitch already has emerging dating shows and panel / discussion shows, political debates, and even pseudo live-therapy. These shows aren't created top down by Twitch, they are simply programs users are creating. These things are drawing growing numbers of viewers and so Twitch is wisely funding them. Twitch itself was an off-spring created when Justin.TV noticed the popularity of video game streams on their platform so they spun out Twitch. Today Twitch is the entirety. It wouldn't be incredibly surprising if something similar happened to Twitch as happened to Justin.TV, who knows. I think it shows incredible foresight that they are able to ride these waves rather than fight them.
- wlesieutre 6y ago
  The takeaway they've gotten from reality TV is that it made a lot of money
- stale2002 6y ago
  This may surprise the normies, but dating stuff on twitch already exists and is extraordinarily popular, for very low production costs. TV dating shows and reality TV involve many dozens of writers, camera/production people, ect, ect, ect But this online psuedo-reality show content just involves a host and ~10 contestants in a zoom call. And these shows get a LOT of viewers for the cost. its 20k and above concurrent viewers. So, with this kind of content, you have a very good cost to viewership ratio.
w-ll 6y ago
Twitch could probably just be read as Amazon for this article. I think it's a bad idea, but also thats pretty much only what MTV (Music TeleVision) has been doing for the last 2 decades and the people that watch just keep eating it up. 15 million merits
- Jaygles 6y ago
  Twitch has been experiencing some feature bloat. The guy who thought of gifting subs should be made a millionaire. The guy who came up with channel points should find other work. The former increases value for both the streamer and Twitch, the latter is a simple distraction taking attention away from the stream content and only serves to increase page interactions. I'm worried they're introducing changes to improve certain metrics and not caring that the changes are basically gaming the metrics.
  - __s 6y ago
    uBlock rules: ||supervisor.ext-twitch.tv/supervisor/v1/index.html$subdocument www.twitch.tv##.tw-full-height.tw-flex.tw-align-items-center.community-points-summary
  - TypeCaste 6y ago
    I also didn't like constantly interacting with channel points, so I made a Firefox extension to do it for me. If you're interested, I could add a setting to hide channel points page updates while still claiming the periodic bonuses. Extension here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/points-clicker https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/points-clicke...
  - Semaphor 6y ago
    I’m watching KattsKitchen [0], a cooking streamer. She has one of the very few channel-points interactions I actually like: You can make her partner do push-ups, have either of them wear a bikini apron for 15 minutes, ask their Google Home a question or have them do a Nerf shootout. [0]: https://www.twitch.tv/kattskitchen https://www.twitch.tv/kattskitchen Warning: foul language and metal
thorum 6y ago
For some context, there are already dozens of Twitch talk shows, dating shows, Bachelor imitations etc. that are extremely popular on the platform - hosted by individual streamers, not the company itself. For example “The Rajjchelor” (hosted by a popular streamer called Rajj) had 71,000 concurrent viewers during its most recent episode. So this is Twitch looking at what is popular on their platform and thinking about how they can create that content themselves.
- 0x8BADF00D 6y ago
  It’s nothing new. The average American is so broke that they need some kind of reality show to live vicariously through.
kabacha 6y ago
Everytime I read "for gamers" I can't help but throw up a bit in my mouth. What's up with this obscure tribalism? I'm having trouble coming up with any other mass-hobby that has such a sour tribalistic identity. I love video-games and board games but defining yourself by type of mass entertainment you consume is just so dystopian to me. > dating for TV watchers
- t-writescode 6y ago
  Are people that play video games defining themselves? Or are other people defining the gamers and they've taken the title for themselves?
  - kabacha 6y ago
    I think there's a good mix of both. There's definitely a marketing push from tech manifacturers-and-like with messages such as "you need to use this gamer mouse if you're a real gamer" but there's also a lot of tribalistic self-segregation. Especially in discussion communities. It's very apparent when you browse various gaming communities on reddit, for example my favorite anecode woul be r/gaymers - it's gay people who play video-games — the correlation here is a real headscratcher. It's much more extreme on platforms like Discord, I've been kicked out from few discord communities because I was a casual gamer and didn't identify myself hard enough with "the brand": "why are you even here if you don't dedicate yourself to gaming 24/7" I don't mean to generalize and gaming communities on average are friendly, fun and enjoyable but the extremes are definitely very vocal and sometimes seem to be steering the medium too much.
    - Mirioron 6y ago
      The tech marketing part makes some sense though. The requirements for gaming are often higher in many ways that people would require for casual use from their devices. I think these extreme gaming communities are set up with gate keeping in mind. Many people that play video games have been a part of communities that eventually just die because "casuals" take it over. That can be frustrating especially for competitive games. I think communities like that are fine, but they aren't meant for everyone.
badderdash 6y ago
Twitch is playing the long game here. If 'gamers' get to meet each other, date, and have kids, Twitch gets more customers! Just kidding though. Gamers are normal people and do regular things too - unlike what popular culture would like you to believe. 'Dating for gamers' sounds like one of those ideas you get to see on Shark Tank. Ridiculous, IMO.
dbcooper 6y ago
Just watch Stavros Halkias' advice show. https://www.twitch.tv/stavvybaby https://www.twitch.tv/stavvybaby
gorgoiler 6y ago
> no escape rooms A shame! I am now wondering if Crystal Maze reruns are available on More4.
Merem 6y ago
Now, if only they could spin off all the gaming content...maybe create a separate website for that. How about Justin.tv? That sounds nice, doesn't it? I've been using the website for over ten years now and it's somewhat sad to see how it has actually deteriorated over time (from the perspective of how it used to be). Having been part of the community that made Justin.tv win against its competition, it feels like they built on our backs, only to slowly abandon us over time. The initial honoring by spinning off Twitch.tv for games exclusively has long worn off, as it was supplanted by non-gaming categories who continue to grow as they happily copy from other streaming websites (Afreeca first and foremost). I really wish there were proper alternatives in the West but network effect is a thing and somehow, their websites are even worse than Twitch.tv (Mixer doesn't work at all at the time of writing this).
- aspenmayer 6y ago
  Is the site worse for gamers now than it was before, in your opinion? Or is there just more of other kinds of content and the issues that can cause. YouTube for example seems an even stranger and worse site compared to Twitch in this context for gamers. However, I haven’t used it much other than to catch some 2d fighting game tournaments, but I had a link to that so I didn’t have to search or browse much. The little I have seemed serviceable, but I am not an expert familiar with its pain points and limitations. Funny you mention Justin.tv. I used to livestream on there with a potable rig I made with an Asus Eee Pc before it was cool. If it was ever cool, it wasn’t on my stream. But I digress. Even back then, people were using it for game streaming and it felt somehow off in the way I think you mean, so thanks for that insight.
  - Merem 6y ago
    It's tough to say, honestly, and it depends on how you define "gamers". The initial batch was all about gaming, usually centered mainly around a community (initially a single game (since there weren't many streamers around) but later also broader categories like speedrunning and competitive gaming). That actually held on for some years. But as the audience grew and grew, they opened the gate for alternative content like "IRL" which really created an opening for people wanting to serve (or exploit if you will) gamers and their needs (they used to have a policy in place where only actual gaming streams were allowed and you could report non-gaming ones). That had already been the case previously where camgirls/former pornstars streamed themselves "playing" a game, fishing for donations and the like. However, they never really fought that and in the end, just embraced it since it meant more money for them (via subs, later also bits as well as more traffic in general). That's not a wrong decision as a company, but it left enough people with a bitter taste in their mouth. One of the main issues is that you basically have no filters. You can't exclude entire categories, you can't exclude individual streams. They have no proper tag system and they got rid of communities. All of that makes it more difficult to find new streams that might be interesting to you specifically. Then there is also the issue with performance. Twitch.tv isn't doing well in my browser and while I do have an "older" PC, other streaming websites don't have that issue. That and the fact that Twitch.tv is overloaded with pointless things I have no interst in ("new prime loot", despite having no such account, channel points which was mentioned elsewhere already, lots of notifications in the chatbox about who donated most, gifted most etc etc) basically forced me to watch Twitch.tv and chat with others (connecting to Twitch server via IRC client) outside of the website. It does work really well for channels you know you like but you will basically never discover new ones without going to the website. Youtube is worse in general and I feel part of the issue is that they tried to bake the livestreams into Youtube proper. While it's not wrong to leverage existing platforms, it certainly wasn't good the way they did it. Also, due to the network effect as well as streamers being tied to one platform, competition isn't much of a thing anymore. As far as I can see it, the competition is long over and Twitch.tv won. The only real challengers were in the Justin.tv days when websites like Livestream and Ustream were actually larger and in the early Twitch era when own3d was still able to compete...until they ran out of money. As for livestreaming platforms for people who are into gaming only? It's possible that one such thing can become relevant even with Twitch.tv around but for that to happen, Twitch.tv would have to be enormous...and even then, they would still offer a larger potential audience. Still, if that happens, the emerging platform might have more of the "pure" gamers around who stream for fun, rather than for money (one of the larger issues I have nowadays - lots of people streaming to make money, having overlays practically begging for it). It depends on what year you are talking about. I still fondly remember the times when Justin.tv was full of illegal cough restreams of the Simpsons, Futurama etc. I even paid for a "pro account" to get preferred treatment when it came to data transfers aka I paid, so that the streams wouldn't lag (and yes, that was a thing back then).
hvasilev 6y ago
Twitch stopped being a gaming streaming website and is technically "Amazon's streaming platform". They want to branch out of gaming (which is their core audience) into general streaming market dominance, but it seems to be very difficult. So they basically started promoting non-gaming streams, which are related to gaming. It was a good plan, but turns out that it didn't work the way that they expected to, since gamers are quite unpredictable. For a while the viewership of twitch is stagnant, and slightly declining. There are many additional reasons for this, but in my humble opinion they should kept the streaming platform niche and focus on promoting gaming content, instead of trying to branch out of it into general streaming.
- slightwinder 6y ago
  > Twitch stopped being a gaming streaming website Don't you mean gaming-only? Because the majority of content (>90% probably) is still gaming.
greendestiny_re 6y ago
I started watching Twitch in 2014 for a highly specific purpose: watch video games played with skill and possibly interact with/support skilled gamers. I stopped watching Twitch in 2018, when it became apparent that Twitch has less to do with video games and more with watching the streamer react to what's happening while feigning to interact with the viewers. When I watch Twitch today, I feel like I'm the one being gamed. I loathe forced interactions, the incessant notifications, popups and added Twitch UI that clutters the screen, even when I maximize the video, making it feel like I'm watching the game through a pinhole. I hate the streamer's constant "thank you for the <X> months sub, <username>" that disrupts any gameplay immersion. In the chat, streamer's bots dominate with their !<command> walls of text while I can't type in anything because I can get banned for certain faces or just can't post at all unless I follow or subscribe (pay money). Besides, it became increasingly more difficult to find skilled gamers because everyone started trend surfing. If SodaPoppin plays an indie game, all of a sudden everyone is playing it to leech off of the fact he can push any category to #1 in the Most Watched group. This leads to tons and tons of crud and brainless filler as streamers play low-value games designed to elicit shock reactions. Why would a skilled guy play an obscure game for his 25 viewers when he can trend surf and grab hundreds of new followers, subscribers and viewers just by playing whatever SodaPoppin is playing? Twitch pouring money into dating content means a perverse incentive to trend surf to the max, game the audience and produce contrived drama. Here's a great example of typical Twitch content, minus the notifications, from CohhCarnage: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/614909188?t=00h13m48s https://www.twitch.tv/videos/614909188?t=00h13m48s Nothing of substance happens in that ~1h video as he plays Fallout 76, he just walks from one merchant to the next, buys stuff, plants veggies, kills 1-2 enemies, reads some text logs and the video ends. It's total filler, with no insightful commentary, no skill portrayed and nothing worth watching. The guy has over 1.2 million followers for no discernible reason. That's Twitch, rewarding the producers of filler. The closest replacement I found was CarcinogenSDA Youtube channel that does old video game speedruns, most often in the "no damage taken" category. It's fascinating and comes in two versions: with or without the player's commentary. That's what I want—turn on a video game speedrun lasting 3-4 hours with no interruptions or the player's contorted face and just enjoy the show. If I want to know how he figured out a certain trick, I can watch the version with the commentary and that's that. No forced interactions, for the love of God. The last fun thing I watched on Twitch were the Power Rangers and YuGiOh marathons in 2018, and even then only because of the 24/7 chat that made them fun.
PunksATawnyFill 6y ago
Twitch's very existence is pathetic.
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]

66 points by haneefmubarak 6y ago

Honest question: Is "gamer" a very useful category? I never enjoyed board games, and I grew up before electronic games existed, so I'm clearly not one. I have relatives who are, however. And they play games that are so different that it seems irrelevant to getting who they are. In other words, doesn't it matter more what sorts of games people like?

Mindwipe 6y ago
I expect "gamer" here is used as shorthand for "Twitch's existing audience."
ausbah 6y ago
as someone in this thread mentioned, being a "gamer" has a very strong group identity despite varying wildly across different genres and platforms however despite the label being so shallow that literally anyone who touches a game every now and then can adopt the label, there still exist gamer "subgroups" who hold vitriolic ideas on what a "real gamer" is. I believe this exclusionary version of the label normally takes the form of men ages 15-35 lashing out at any game that veers too far from what is "acceptable" on race, gender, sex, etc. deeming them to be the byproduct of "SJWs who want to ruin our games"
- mirimir 6y ago
  That's what I was thinking, more or less. And I just found this survey: https://www.polygon.com/2017/1/20/14337282/games-for-women-and-girls https://www.polygon.com/2017/1/20/14337282/games-for-women-a... I'm guessing that "real gamers" play games that are most popular among male players. But maybe "gamer" is simply shorthand for "people who play games". Edit: So am I a "gamer", because I pose online as various fictional personas? Or because, in meatspace, I pose as an unremarkable person?

wyck 6y ago

Dating? So they learned nothing about the dismal effects of reality TV's on culture and content creators? Here's a better suggestion, fire the person who thought moving laterally into a garbage dump was a good idea.

cat199 6y ago
> So they learned nothing about the dismal effects of reality TV's on culture and content creators? no, in the hetero case at least, they probably learned alot from being able to monetize a ridiculous desparate-M:attractive-F ratio from things like tinder
paulcole 6y ago
I knew Chuck Woolery was responsible for society’s ills.
istorical 6y ago
At this point Twitch is starting to become part of Big Content, and Big Content doesn't care about what you think is good for society, Big Content cares about what gets clicks and views. Twitch already has emerging dating shows and panel / discussion shows, political debates, and even pseudo live-therapy. These shows aren't created top down by Twitch, they are simply programs users are creating. These things are drawing growing numbers of viewers and so Twitch is wisely funding them. Twitch itself was an off-spring created when Justin.TV noticed the popularity of video game streams on their platform so they spun out Twitch. Today Twitch is the entirety. It wouldn't be incredibly surprising if something similar happened to Twitch as happened to Justin.TV, who knows. I think it shows incredible foresight that they are able to ride these waves rather than fight them.
wlesieutre 6y ago
The takeaway they've gotten from reality TV is that it made a lot of money
stale2002 6y ago
This may surprise the normies, but dating stuff on twitch already exists and is extraordinarily popular, for very low production costs. TV dating shows and reality TV involve many dozens of writers, camera/production people, ect, ect, ect But this online psuedo-reality show content just involves a host and ~10 contestants in a zoom call. And these shows get a LOT of viewers for the cost. its 20k and above concurrent viewers. So, with this kind of content, you have a very good cost to viewership ratio.

w-ll 6y ago

Twitch could probably just be read as Amazon for this article. I think it's a bad idea, but also thats pretty much only what MTV (Music TeleVision) has been doing for the last 2 decades and the people that watch just keep eating it up. 15 million merits

Jaygles 6y ago
Twitch has been experiencing some feature bloat. The guy who thought of gifting subs should be made a millionaire. The guy who came up with channel points should find other work. The former increases value for both the streamer and Twitch, the latter is a simple distraction taking attention away from the stream content and only serves to increase page interactions. I'm worried they're introducing changes to improve certain metrics and not caring that the changes are basically gaming the metrics.
- __s 6y ago
  uBlock rules: ||supervisor.ext-twitch.tv/supervisor/v1/index.html$subdocument www.twitch.tv##.tw-full-height.tw-flex.tw-align-items-center.community-points-summary
- TypeCaste 6y ago
  I also didn't like constantly interacting with channel points, so I made a Firefox extension to do it for me. If you're interested, I could add a setting to hide channel points page updates while still claiming the periodic bonuses. Extension here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/points-clicker https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/points-clicke...
- Semaphor 6y ago
  I’m watching KattsKitchen [0], a cooking streamer. She has one of the very few channel-points interactions I actually like: You can make her partner do push-ups, have either of them wear a bikini apron for 15 minutes, ask their Google Home a question or have them do a Nerf shootout. [0]: https://www.twitch.tv/kattskitchen https://www.twitch.tv/kattskitchen Warning: foul language and metal

thorum 6y ago

For some context, there are already dozens of Twitch talk shows, dating shows, Bachelor imitations etc. that are extremely popular on the platform - hosted by individual streamers, not the company itself. For example “The Rajjchelor” (hosted by a popular streamer called Rajj) had 71,000 concurrent viewers during its most recent episode. So this is Twitch looking at what is popular on their platform and thinking about how they can create that content themselves.

0x8BADF00D 6y ago
It’s nothing new. The average American is so broke that they need some kind of reality show to live vicariously through.

kabacha 6y ago

Everytime I read "for gamers" I can't help but throw up a bit in my mouth. What's up with this obscure tribalism? I'm having trouble coming up with any other mass-hobby that has such a sour tribalistic identity. I love video-games and board games but defining yourself by type of mass entertainment you consume is just so dystopian to me. > dating for TV watchers

t-writescode 6y ago
Are people that play video games defining themselves? Or are other people defining the gamers and they've taken the title for themselves?
- kabacha 6y ago
  I think there's a good mix of both. There's definitely a marketing push from tech manifacturers-and-like with messages such as "you need to use this gamer mouse if you're a real gamer" but there's also a lot of tribalistic self-segregation. Especially in discussion communities. It's very apparent when you browse various gaming communities on reddit, for example my favorite anecode woul be r/gaymers - it's gay people who play video-games — the correlation here is a real headscratcher. It's much more extreme on platforms like Discord, I've been kicked out from few discord communities because I was a casual gamer and didn't identify myself hard enough with "the brand": "why are you even here if you don't dedicate yourself to gaming 24/7" I don't mean to generalize and gaming communities on average are friendly, fun and enjoyable but the extremes are definitely very vocal and sometimes seem to be steering the medium too much.
  - Mirioron 6y ago
    The tech marketing part makes some sense though. The requirements for gaming are often higher in many ways that people would require for casual use from their devices. I think these extreme gaming communities are set up with gate keeping in mind. Many people that play video games have been a part of communities that eventually just die because "casuals" take it over. That can be frustrating especially for competitive games. I think communities like that are fine, but they aren't meant for everyone.

badderdash 6y ago

Twitch is playing the long game here. If 'gamers' get to meet each other, date, and have kids, Twitch gets more customers! Just kidding though. Gamers are normal people and do regular things too - unlike what popular culture would like you to believe. 'Dating for gamers' sounds like one of those ideas you get to see on Shark Tank. Ridiculous, IMO.

dbcooper 6y ago

Just watch Stavros Halkias' advice show. https://www.twitch.tv/stavvybaby https://www.twitch.tv/stavvybaby

gorgoiler 6y ago

> no escape rooms A shame! I am now wondering if Crystal Maze reruns are available on More4.

Merem 6y ago

Now, if only they could spin off all the gaming content...maybe create a separate website for that. How about Justin.tv? That sounds nice, doesn't it? I've been using the website for over ten years now and it's somewhat sad to see how it has actually deteriorated over time (from the perspective of how it used to be). Having been part of the community that made Justin.tv win against its competition, it feels like they built on our backs, only to slowly abandon us over time. The initial honoring by spinning off Twitch.tv for games exclusively has long worn off, as it was supplanted by non-gaming categories who continue to grow as they happily copy from other streaming websites (Afreeca first and foremost). I really wish there were proper alternatives in the West but network effect is a thing and somehow, their websites are even worse than Twitch.tv (Mixer doesn't work at all at the time of writing this).

aspenmayer 6y ago
Is the site worse for gamers now than it was before, in your opinion? Or is there just more of other kinds of content and the issues that can cause. YouTube for example seems an even stranger and worse site compared to Twitch in this context for gamers. However, I haven’t used it much other than to catch some 2d fighting game tournaments, but I had a link to that so I didn’t have to search or browse much. The little I have seemed serviceable, but I am not an expert familiar with its pain points and limitations. Funny you mention Justin.tv. I used to livestream on there with a potable rig I made with an Asus Eee Pc before it was cool. If it was ever cool, it wasn’t on my stream. But I digress. Even back then, people were using it for game streaming and it felt somehow off in the way I think you mean, so thanks for that insight.
- Merem 6y ago
  It's tough to say, honestly, and it depends on how you define "gamers". The initial batch was all about gaming, usually centered mainly around a community (initially a single game (since there weren't many streamers around) but later also broader categories like speedrunning and competitive gaming). That actually held on for some years. But as the audience grew and grew, they opened the gate for alternative content like "IRL" which really created an opening for people wanting to serve (or exploit if you will) gamers and their needs (they used to have a policy in place where only actual gaming streams were allowed and you could report non-gaming ones). That had already been the case previously where camgirls/former pornstars streamed themselves "playing" a game, fishing for donations and the like. However, they never really fought that and in the end, just embraced it since it meant more money for them (via subs, later also bits as well as more traffic in general). That's not a wrong decision as a company, but it left enough people with a bitter taste in their mouth. One of the main issues is that you basically have no filters. You can't exclude entire categories, you can't exclude individual streams. They have no proper tag system and they got rid of communities. All of that makes it more difficult to find new streams that might be interesting to you specifically. Then there is also the issue with performance. Twitch.tv isn't doing well in my browser and while I do have an "older" PC, other streaming websites don't have that issue. That and the fact that Twitch.tv is overloaded with pointless things I have no interst in ("new prime loot", despite having no such account, channel points which was mentioned elsewhere already, lots of notifications in the chatbox about who donated most, gifted most etc etc) basically forced me to watch Twitch.tv and chat with others (connecting to Twitch server via IRC client) outside of the website. It does work really well for channels you know you like but you will basically never discover new ones without going to the website. Youtube is worse in general and I feel part of the issue is that they tried to bake the livestreams into Youtube proper. While it's not wrong to leverage existing platforms, it certainly wasn't good the way they did it. Also, due to the network effect as well as streamers being tied to one platform, competition isn't much of a thing anymore. As far as I can see it, the competition is long over and Twitch.tv won. The only real challengers were in the Justin.tv days when websites like Livestream and Ustream were actually larger and in the early Twitch era when own3d was still able to compete...until they ran out of money. As for livestreaming platforms for people who are into gaming only? It's possible that one such thing can become relevant even with Twitch.tv around but for that to happen, Twitch.tv would have to be enormous...and even then, they would still offer a larger potential audience. Still, if that happens, the emerging platform might have more of the "pure" gamers around who stream for fun, rather than for money (one of the larger issues I have nowadays - lots of people streaming to make money, having overlays practically begging for it). It depends on what year you are talking about. I still fondly remember the times when Justin.tv was full of illegal cough restreams of the Simpsons, Futurama etc. I even paid for a "pro account" to get preferred treatment when it came to data transfers aka I paid, so that the streams wouldn't lag (and yes, that was a thing back then).

hvasilev 6y ago

Twitch stopped being a gaming streaming website and is technically "Amazon's streaming platform". They want to branch out of gaming (which is their core audience) into general streaming market dominance, but it seems to be very difficult. So they basically started promoting non-gaming streams, which are related to gaming. It was a good plan, but turns out that it didn't work the way that they expected to, since gamers are quite unpredictable. For a while the viewership of twitch is stagnant, and slightly declining. There are many additional reasons for this, but in my humble opinion they should kept the streaming platform niche and focus on promoting gaming content, instead of trying to branch out of it into general streaming.

slightwinder 6y ago
> Twitch stopped being a gaming streaming website Don't you mean gaming-only? Because the majority of content (>90% probably) is still gaming.

greendestiny_re 6y ago

I started watching Twitch in 2014 for a highly specific purpose: watch video games played with skill and possibly interact with/support skilled gamers. I stopped watching Twitch in 2018, when it became apparent that Twitch has less to do with video games and more with watching the streamer react to what's happening while feigning to interact with the viewers. When I watch Twitch today, I feel like I'm the one being gamed. I loathe forced interactions, the incessant notifications, popups and added Twitch UI that clutters the screen, even when I maximize the video, making it feel like I'm watching the game through a pinhole. I hate the streamer's constant "thank you for the <X> months sub, <username>" that disrupts any gameplay immersion. In the chat, streamer's bots dominate with their !<command> walls of text while I can't type in anything because I can get banned for certain faces or just can't post at all unless I follow or subscribe (pay money). Besides, it became increasingly more difficult to find skilled gamers because everyone started trend surfing. If SodaPoppin plays an indie game, all of a sudden everyone is playing it to leech off of the fact he can push any category to #1 in the Most Watched group. This leads to tons and tons of crud and brainless filler as streamers play low-value games designed to elicit shock reactions. Why would a skilled guy play an obscure game for his 25 viewers when he can trend surf and grab hundreds of new followers, subscribers and viewers just by playing whatever SodaPoppin is playing? Twitch pouring money into dating content means a perverse incentive to trend surf to the max, game the audience and produce contrived drama. Here's a great example of typical Twitch content, minus the notifications, from CohhCarnage: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/614909188?t=00h13m48s https://www.twitch.tv/videos/614909188?t=00h13m48s Nothing of substance happens in that ~1h video as he plays Fallout 76, he just walks from one merchant to the next, buys stuff, plants veggies, kills 1-2 enemies, reads some text logs and the video ends. It's total filler, with no insightful commentary, no skill portrayed and nothing worth watching. The guy has over 1.2 million followers for no discernible reason. That's Twitch, rewarding the producers of filler. The closest replacement I found was CarcinogenSDA Youtube channel that does old video game speedruns, most often in the "no damage taken" category. It's fascinating and comes in two versions: with or without the player's commentary. That's what I want—turn on a video game speedrun lasting 3-4 hours with no interruptions or the player's contorted face and just enjoy the show. If I want to know how he figured out a certain trick, I can watch the version with the commentary and that's that. No forced interactions, for the love of God. The last fun thing I watched on Twitch were the Power Rangers and YuGiOh marathons in 2018, and even then only because of the 24/7 chat that made them fun.

PunksATawnyFill 6y ago

Twitch's very existence is pathetic.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]