3 ms·
I'm trying to figure out what sort of "meaningless details or structure" you are referring to. Do you mean the "sending" "receiving" junk that briefly surfaced
by hcknwscommenter 6y ago
I'm trying to figure out what sort of "meaningless details or structure" you are referring to. Do you mean the "sending" "receiving" junk that briefly surfaced to allow patents to "doing random things on a server"?
- pnw_hazor 6y agoI mean claiming machine details that have nothing to do with novelty such as "...; and wherein the received xxx is stored in one or more locations in a memory hardware buffer." Clearly, clauses like this do not support novelty but neither are they practically limiting because every computer does this. Sometimes it took more effort/amendments, but this shows the general idea. Though, I guess such amendments could be seen as limiting old-school business method claims, but I don't consider business method patents to be software patents.