37 ms·
> As for me, well, when Spacemacs moves the LSP layer to its non-development branch, I'll probably give it a try again You're doing yourself a discervice for n
by didibus 7y ago
> As for me, well, when Spacemacs moves the LSP layer to its non-development branch, I'll probably give it a try again
You're doing yourself a discervice for not just using Spacemacs develop branch. It's actually more stable than the master branch.
- vvillena 7y agoI use and love Spacemacs, but their branch handling is a major PR fuckup. The last stable version should be phased out now. The develop branch works way better. They should rethink their release model.
- didibus 7y agoTrue, just think they need to embrace the fast development cadence of develop and just make that master.
- chipotle_coyote 7y agoInteresting. I switched to the develop branch the other day (yes, just to try to get LSP working!) and ran into some glitch that I didn't have the time to investigate -- a complaint about the .spacemacs file missing a variable or something. I'll probably try again this weekend.
- didibus 7y agoYou need to run SPC f e D to do a 3-way merge of your .spacemacs everytime after you upgrade Spacemacs. As changes to Spacemacs are made, there might need more or less things in the .spacemacs file. So you always need to do a manual merge of the changes.
- chipotle_coyote 7y agoThanks for the tip. I had no idea that was a thing -- although it absolutely makes sense, thinking about it!