What does the new guidance say then? I'm curious to hear a counterpoint on the substance of the guidance from someone that might have the expertise to go into i

What does the new guidance say then? I'm curious to hear a counterpoint on the substance of the guidance from someone that might have the expertise to go into it. I agree with you on the EFFs article being substance-free and manipulative, and I'd like to know what the substantive counterpoint is from someone who can interpret the guidance.