3 ms·
Some of my words ("poisonous") strengthen my statements. Others ("demonstrably better") restrict them. I'm aware that the relative power of tools isn't a tota
by loup-vaillant 16y ago
Some of my words ("poisonous") strengthen my statements. Others ("demonstrably better") restrict them. I'm aware that the relative power of tools isn't a total order. For instance, I disagree with "git > svn". For now. Therefore, bashing svn and praising git specifically isn't a good idea. But distribution may well dominate centralization for version control in general. I think the article has a point there.
- selectnull 16y agoLike I said, in general, I agree with the message (of the article) which is in a nutshell: git is newer and uses a different paradigm than svn which helps in many ways. Like I also said, I didn't like the tone of the article which was "svn is dead and you should be moving along". I also think the article has a point. I just don't think it was written in most productive (dare I say fair?) way.