> I should also add that Elisp is an absolutely terrible programming language when compared to more modern alternatives. This is a commonly seen complaint, and

> I should also add that Elisp is an absolutely terrible programming language when compared to more modern alternatives. This is a commonly seen complaint, and I do not completely disagree with you. But really, if there were better options to create an editor on top of some sort of lisp-machine equivalent, why are there such few equivalent editors out there? I would be happy to move to a new mature ecosystem that allows the sort of flexibility offered by emacs, on which tools like magit and org-mode may become popular, but I am yet to find anything in the same ballpark.