I guess the difference is I don't see it as charity, especially not a "forced charity". You're stuck in viewing things in through a lens of how private propert

I guess the difference is I don't see it as charity, especially not a "forced charity". You're stuck in viewing things in through a lens of how private property works now. Why is it that those who own some land deserve a cut of the profits of that land? That land was stolen at some point. Who says that anyone can truly claim ownership of land? Isn't land to be owned by all? And the same can be said of much more then just land. Instead of the work of all previous generations and large parts of land being inherited by the few who are lucky enough to be born to the rich or whatever, it should be distributed to everyone. That can take the form of UBI. For an argument of these points, read the first 3 chapters of of The Conquest of Bread by Peter Kropotkin. https://thebreadbook.org/conquestofbread.html https://thebreadbook.org/conquestofbread.html