3 ms·
Interesting that your build times are slower with clang. I've found on most of my projects clang is roughly 30% faster to compile in debug, but release I haven'
by tele_ski 6y ago
Interesting that your build times are slower with clang. I've found on most of my projects clang is roughly 30% faster to compile in debug, but release I haven't seen a huge difference between the two.
- petters 6y agoPerhaps they are slower because Clang is doing static analysis in this case.
- CoolGuySteve 6y agoStatic analysis is a lot slower but regular clang++ is also significantly slower than g++, like a 4-5 minute build time vs 2:30 on g++. It might have something to do with a heavy usage of templates in a few files, I don't know. Clang's autovectorization is better in a few functions I disassembled but otherwise the generated code doesn't benchmark any faster, it's better in some places, worse in others.
- cheez 6y agoNope, also slower for me.
- moonchild 6y agoMy build times are identical between GCC and Clang (debug and release). But TCC is 10x faster than both of them.