3 ms·
There's a big difference between considering national security issues and bungling foreign direct investment completely (except for real estate). It's also no e
by cal5k 6y ago
There's a big difference between considering national security issues and bungling foreign direct investment completely (except for real estate). It's also no excuse for the protection of oligopolies that don't act in the best interests of Canadians.
- 52-6F-62 6y agoIn that case I'll take the likely unpopular opinion that: it's better our assholes than someone else's. And foreign direct investment in energy, food supplies, telecommunications absolutely has national security implications. I would be loathe to have a foreign entity become the major stateholder in our telecommunications infrastructure. I don't harbour any deep love of the Rogers family, but they are solidly Canadian at least.